Wednesday, November 25, 2009
Medical Transcription Companies in Usa
Most of the medical transcription companies in the USA can provide superior quality, accurate medical transcription services as they employ highly skilled and experienced medical transcriptionists on staff. Moreover, these services are mostly cost-effective to cater to all kinds of budgets. These companies take care to apply and maintain up-to-date digital technologies to provide value-added transcription services.
In the USA, medical transcription companies provide services in almost all medical specialties. Professionals in these firms can undertake transcription of various medical reports including cardiology reports, operative reports, patient discharge summaries, emergency room reports, history and physical examination reports, chart notes, medical evaluations, peer reviews, psychiatric evaluations, x-ray reports and many more.
The greatest advantage of availing of the medical transcription services from a standard MT firm in the USA is that you can get access to accurate and efficient services within fast turnaround time. Apart from this, other benefits that you can gain include:
• 99% accuracy
• Security and confidentiality of the medical records and documents
• Three-tier quality checking with assured high quality work
• HIPAA compliant medical transcription services
• Electronic Medical Record (EMR) solution
• Total dictation and transcription solution
If you need a complete medical transcription solution or if you are considering outsourcing your medical transcription assignments, you will be able to find medical transcription companies online that can meet your needs. If you are interested in finding a standard medical transcription company in the USA, there are some important considerations that you need to take into account before making your choice. It is an excellent idea to conduct some research on your own in order to get the best deals.
Article Source : http://www.1om.net.cn/25/2182/16/41.html
Monday, November 23, 2009
Hospitals and EMRs: Stimulating a connection


Availability of government stimulus money, combined with hospitals being allowed to finance portions of physicians' electronic medical record systems, could make EMR adoption a veritable bargain. Or the stimulus money could make hospital systems less eager to help pay for your EMR, figuring that government funds will instead.
Either way, the possibility of combining two avenues of EMR funding has added a twist to the economic picture for physicians deciding what, when and whether to buy.
Doctors can get a maximum of $44,000 in funds from the federal economic stimulus package for adopting a certified EMR system that meets the government's "meaningful use" standards. How much physicians get in stimulus funds will be based on the percentage of their practice that is made up of Medicare or Medicaid patients. Hospitals can get their own share of stimulus funds, but the amount depends on how they're connected with physicians.
- Questioning the offer
- What hospitals stand to gain
- See related content
- Topic: Electronic medical records
"There's a lot of activity going on," said Amy Leopard, health care attorney and partner at Walter & Haverfield in Cleveland. "Incentive payments have spurred that dialogue."
Some hospital systems are making their offers to physicians more generous; others are figuring out the role subsidies should play in light of the stimulus money.
"I have seen a variety of directions, and even within different hospitals, they are providing a menu of resources for physicians," Leopard said.
More help for doctors
North Shore-Long Island [N.Y.] Jewish Health System started talking about helping affiliated physicians pay for their EMR systems about nine months before the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, or federal stimulus package, passed in February.
After the bill was enacted, North Shore continued its plan to offer subsidies of up to $40,000 per physician. That, combined with stimulus funds, could give affiliated practices up to $84,000 per doctor for EMRs.
"To support the highest quality of care that comes with electronic medical records, an offering to make it easier was warranted," said Michael Oppenheim, MD, medical information officer for North Shore.
The health system is offering two tiers of subsidies. Any affiliated physician can get up to 60% of the purchase price of an EMR. Physicians who agree to share data can get up to 85% of the purchase price -- the highest percentage allowed under Stark laws. Neither offer can exceed $40,000.
Dr. Oppenheim said North Shore already had started setting up a regional health information exchange that would help the hospital system qualify for the data-exchange incentive offered by the stimulus act.
Hospitals "have to show the ability to share data to improve quality of care. So if the hospital doesn't have anyone to share with, they will have a hard time demonstrating that," said Amy Fehn, a health care attorney for Wachler and Associates in Royal Oak, Mich.
But some hospitals, especially those in rural areas, may find their only chance to qualify for these incentives come from offering subsidies so physicians get EMRs, expert say.
Stimulus money is spread over five years and won't arrive until after an EMR system is purchased, Fehn said. So physicians still should talk to hospitals about help with upfront costs.
"What I've heard ... is that the small amount [of stimulus money] won't make a huge dent in the cost of an EMR, so I would expect that [physicians] will still be looking toward the hospitals for some assistance," Fehn said.
To qualify for stimulus money, physicians must adopt systems that are interoperable with other hospital systems, Fehn said. "That's the other catch."
Attorney Mary Jean Geroulo of the Dallas firm Stewart Stimmel agreed the stimulus money alone might not be enough for some physicians, and the Stark exceptions are important for the health care industry to meet the government's goal of digitizing all patient files.
"If hospitals have the ability to get affiliated physicians up to speed, we will have made huge strides," she said. And the Stark deadline -- scheduled to expire in 2013, before the stimulus incentives for EMR use turn into penalties for disuse -- could be extended if there's a demonstrated need.
"Hospitals will be taking advantage of this if they haven't already," Geroulo said.
For nephrologist Simon Prince, MD, North Shore medical staff president, the subsidy from the health system meant the difference between getting an inexpensive model or getting a pricier, higher quality system. If all they had was the stimulus incentive money, "A lot of people probably would have picked cheaper vendors," he said.
The hospital's offer was just one more factor pushing physicians toward adoption, Dr. Prince said.
"It's the stimulus money, it's the Stark exemptions, it's the North Shore Health System. All of these things are playing a role, and it's all allowing the enthusiasm to bubble up here. Everyone, I think, is getting on board."
Reconsidering the subsidy
Tufts Medical Center began offering subsidies more than a year ago. It saw them as a good business strategy, as "the community physicians' role is very important to our success at a larger level," said Bill Shickolovich, Tufts vice president and chief information officer.
Shickolovich sees Tufts' contributions in two parts -- to defray costs and to show good faith that the medical center was "committed to making this work, together."
Tufts is still committed to getting its affiliated physicians connected, he said. But "because the stimulus funding has not yet started, we at Tufts Medical Center have not yet decided how to balance any stimulus opportunities with our subsidies."
Possible scenarios some hospitals are considering include having affiliated physicians share subsidies with the sponsoring hospitals or even repay the entire subsidized amount. But those possibilities raise legal questions, which is why many hospitals haven't decided what to do yet.
After the stimulus bill was passed, Leopard said, several of her hospital clients said they were glad they hadn't yet offered subsidies. But the ones that did haven't discussed "backing up the truck and taking them away." Some are thinking of other approaches, outside of the Stark exemptions, that would provide assistance without footing the bill, she added.
"I think it's very dynamic, and a lot of different, creative approaches are being discussed," Leopard said. But whatever the source of funding, doctors still need to weigh the options before adopting any EMR system.
One possibility is an application service provider EMR, Leopard said. Hospital and physician practices can access an ASP-model EMR online, which means neither group has to invest in the expense of an on-site server. The systems are hosted remotely and accessible via the Internet for both the hospital and affiliated physicians.
Hospitals also could act as vendors and sell licenses to doctors who want to connect. Or hospitals can negotiate with vendors for discounts for affiliated practices.
But affordability shouldn't be the only consideration in choosing an EMR. It's crucial, experts say, that the system makes sense for the practice. Having to switch systems later could create major problems, Leopard warned.
Doctors should study any offer's conditions and not assume that a hospital system will meet the meaningful use criteria and qualify them for incentive money. "It's going to be a bad scene if [physicians] spend all this money and don't get the [incentive] funds. They need to proceed cautiously," Fehn said.
There are cautions for hospitals as well. Hospitals that previously offered the maximum subsidy allowed under the Stark exceptions might consider lowering that amount for physicians who haven't yet accepted their offers. But, attorneys warn, if this is perceived as favoritism to practices that make more referrals, it's an antitrust violation.
Attorneys advise physicians to ask sponsoring hospitals about previous offers. Physicians also should get any new offers in writing, with an expiration date.
Before accepting any hospital subsidy, Michigan health care attorney Fehn warns, physicians should "put some thought into it and not just jump on the first bandwagon that comes along."
Article Source : http://www.ama-assn.org/amednews/2009/11/23/bisa1123.htm
Monday, November 16, 2009
Medical Transcription and Dictation Services
These days, medical transcription and dictation services are provided to various healthcare settings including clinics, nursing homes, hospitals, healthcare centers and long term acute care centers. Medical transcription is one of the IT related challenging services that require outstanding execution skill with professionalism.
Nature of Work
Medical transcription and dictation services comprise the conversion of a physician’s audio files into written transcripts. The process involves the following steps-
- Physicians dictate their notes into a digital recording device, which involves toll-free phone lines, PC dictation and handheld digital recorders
- Transfer of these voice recordings to transcribers via a file transfer protocol (FTP)
- Medical transcriptionist transcribes the audio files into text format
- Transcribed reports are sent back via browser based secure 256 bit AES encrypted file transfer protocol
Transcription Companies Offer Perfect Solutions
There are many transcription companies that offer medical transcription and dictation services to improve your overall efficiency and patient care. Based on customer requirements, they prepare chart notes, rehabilitation notes, radiography reports, radiology reports, history and physical reports, discharge summaries, progress reports, psychiatric evaluations, emergency notes and SOAP notes.
Medical transcription providers utilize advanced dictation and transcription systems, and meet all HIPAA regulations for electronic transmission of patient information.
Advantages of Medical Transcription and Dictation Services
- Competitive pricing
- Pragmatic and flexible approach
- Streamline information workflow
- Increase efficiency
- Secured access for authorized users to all transcribed reports
- Quick turnaround time
- High data accuracy and security
- Secured access for authorized users to all transcribed reports
- HL7-Based EMR integration capabilities
Approach a Competent Medical Transcription Firm
Find a reliable medical transcription company to benefit from high quality medical transcription and dictation services. While choosing such a service provider, consider the three most important factors - accuracy, turnaround time and security.
Thursday, November 5, 2009
ARRA Incentives for EHR Implementation: How Much and When?
The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) includes reimbursements to hospitals and physicians for electronic health record (EHR) implementation. Amounts and schedules are subject to change as the rules and regulations are finalized, but we can go over what EHR implementation reimbursement specifics look like today.
There are four possible reimbursement scenarios. Let’s take a look at EHR implementation financial incentives for each:
Hospitals and Medicare Reimbursements
Incentives begin in 2010 for meaningful users of EHRs. There are 3 components to the incentive payment calculation: a) initial or base amount, b) the Medicare share, and c) a transition factor. For more information on how to calculate this figure for your situation, click here. The initial amount can be figured like this: start with a one-time base payment of $2 million. Add $200 per Medicare patient discharge above a base level of 1,499 annual discharges. Let’s run the numbers on an example: If you have 150 Medicare discharges per week, you would be eligible for reimbursement for 6,301 discharges @ $200 each, for an additional $1,260,200. That first year, the hospital is eligible for $3,260,200 in payments (base $2,000,000 plus $1,260,200 for Medicare discharges) to cover the costs of implementing EHRs/health information technology (HIT).
These payments decrease over time. In our example, for year two, the hospital would receive 75% of the initial amount, or $1,695,150. Payments in the third year drop to 50%. The fourth — and final — year reimbursement drops to 25% of the initial payment. The 4-year cap for any single hospital is $11 million. Remember this important ARRA feature: there will be no incentive payments for hospitals that become meaningful users after 2015.
Hospitals and Medicaid Reimbursements
Calculating hospital Medicaid EHR implementation reimbursement is more complex. It’ll be calculated using a base payment plus additional payments calculated on inpatient bed days and other factors. For an acute care hospital Medicaid must comprise at least 10% of total volume. Children’s hospitals of any Medicaid volume are eligible for the incentives.
Important note: You can be reimbursed by Medicare or Medicaid, but not both.
Whether you opt for Medicare or Medicaid, to get maximum incentives, the technology you implement must be certified and you must meet meaningful use standards, which are still something of a moving target. And, like the hospital-Medicare example above, you must implement by 2015.
Individual Providers and Medicare
If you are a qualified non-hospital-based provider, you can be reimbursed for the costs of implementing HIT. You still have to meet the meaningful use test and implement approved systems. Payments are made over a five-year period.
The maximum EHR implementation reimbursement available to an individual provider under Medicare is $44,000, unless you are in a Health Professional Shortage Area, in which case payments would be increased 10 percent. Payment is equal to 75 percent of Medicare allowable charges for covered services furnished by an Eligible Provider, subject to the maximums noted below.
- Payments max out at $18,000 if you implement in 2011 or 2012
- If your first year is 2013, maximum payment will be $15,000. Only $12,000 is possible if you wait till 2014.
- In the second year, payment will be $12,000
- In the third year, payment will be $8,000
- Payments drop to $4,000 in the fourth year and $2,000 in the fifth year.
Providers and Medicaid Reimbursements
Non-hospital-based providers qualifying under ARRA’s Medicaid reimbursement provisions may get $75,000 to help with EHR implementation. First year reimbursement could be as much as $25,000 with up to $10,000 per year for the next five years.
You must meet the meaningful use test and use certified EHR products to qualify. As with hospitals, you may elect to be reimbursed by Medicare or Medicaid, but not both.
In general, the rules are set up to encourage early adoption of qualified systems. When the incentive period ends, disincentives will be phased in. Starting in 2016, Medicare and Medicaid fee schedules will begin to decrease for hospitals and providers who are not meaningfully using qualified EHR systems. Those late or non-adopters will see a cut of 1 percent per year up to a possible maximum of 5%. So, it pays to understand timelines and implementation standards as quickly as possible to avoid negative impact to your bottom line.
Article Source : http://blog.pchealthstop.com/?p=551
Wednesday, November 4, 2009
Medical Transcription: How it is Beneficial to Medical Practitioners and Medical Companies
Medical transcription is a process of writing whatever the doctor or medical practitioner says in a text or document format after doctor examines the patient. These pre-recorded medical words from healthcare professionals are translated in the form of a document or any other text format by professional medical transcriptionists. This process can be done at any place according to the medical professional’s convenience by using remote transmission technologies. It saves precious time of doctors and helps them in concentrating on their practice.
Medical transcription services provide number of advantages to Medicare companies, such as:
Faster turnaround time
Higher accuracy
Improved workflow
Even in hospitals, they have to keep necessary documents of patients or say they have to maintain medical records. Medical transcriptionist transcribes dictations or recordings into a text record. These are then maintained in two ways, either as soft copy or as hard copy. But in today’s IT enabled world, soft copies or EMR (Electronic Medical Report) are more used than traditional medical documents as they are easier to maintain.
Medical transcriptionist is responsible for creating these reports. So it is obvious that he must be very well aware of medical terminology. He should be careful that medical records prepared by him should follow medical transcription standards. Some of these standards are AHDI (Association for Healthcare Documentation Integrity), MTIA (Medical Transcription Industry Association) etc.
In medical transcription process, medical transcriptionist also takes care of current medical industry. He constantly updates himself by researching latest medical tools, medical language and equipments. Thus he keeps providing best results to medical professionals and medical companies.
Article Source : http://www.xinnet6.cn/40/04/2314.html